Buy: Adding a non-hot weirdo into Twilight Sequel
You may remember me saying that I was excited that Drew Barrymore may be the director to Twilight’s New Moon movie adaptation. Just as a refresher, the first movie was lol-able. It was garbage but still a so-called phenomenon. So, I want them to get worse and worse and more and more indirectly funny. So, when news of creepy child star Dakota Fanning apparently joining the cast in New Moon… OMG… I am now even more psyched for the train wreck that should be hitting theaters November 20th, 2009.

From what I hear (keep in mind I didn’t read these books), the second book/movie is all about werewolves and their feud with vampires. Yeah, so good, right? So is the blonde is supposed to be a vampire, which means not wearing fangs and no sucking blood . (THESE MOVIES SUCK SO GOOD!) So what is this role:
Jane is a member of Italy’s Volturi, the most deadly group of bloodsucking killers in author Stephenie Meyer’s best-selling series… Jane is described as a petite blonde wit ha “Botteicelli angel-like face… [and] crimson irisies.” While fellow [vampires] “are three times the size of her, they are terrified of her”… An online petition started by a Twilight fan already asks the studio… to cast Fanning because she would be “perfect” for the role.
Here are some notes:
- A vampire, a really scary vampire, is named Jane.
- Apparently, they are adding something that could be associated with vampires such as red irises
- Midget vampire
- Twilight fans are still crazy
- Why is perfect in quotes?
- I would be offended if some one said I was “perfect” for anything associated with Twilight.
Twilight is quickly becoming the place where child stars go to die.








One Comment, Comment or Ping
BUY! I love Dakota Fanning! Also, I think perfect is in quotes because they’re quoting the petition?
Reply to “Buy: Adding a non-hot weirdo into Twilight Sequel”